At £131,000, Katie Hopkins should realise that trolling on Twitter is an expensive hobby – The Secret Barrister

Some of my thoughts on the Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins defamation judgment are up on I News, should anyone wish to read them:

https://inews.co.uk/opinion/comment/131000-katie-hopkins-realise-trolling-twitter-expensive-hobby/

March 11, 2017 thesecretbarrister Lawsplaining Courts, Defamation, Law, Libel, Media, Twitter

3 Replies

Ampleforth Melissa says:

March 12, 2017 at 10:23 pm

Neither Monroe nor Hopkins seem very likeable. Surely the real scandal though is the massive amount of costs. Who is getting rich here?

Loading...
Meklissa Hadjicostas says:

March 13, 2017 at 2:48 pm

Isn’t the main issue here the incredible level of costs?

Loading...
Ciaran Goggins says:

March 13, 2017 at 5:18 pm

Ask Sally Bercow?

Loading...

Comments are closed.

Guest Post by CrimeGirl: The fallacy of the fat cat legal aid lawyer

Accusing this judge of “victim blaming” is unfair, wrong and dangerous